Tag Archive for: bladder cancer

Cxbladder Urine Testing for Urothelial Cancer: Diagnosis, Surveillance, Accuracy and Pitfalls

Bladder cancer surveillance can feel repetitive: another cystoscopy, another urine sample and another anxious wait. This has driven interest in urine-based molecular tests that may help identify patients at very low risk of recurrent urothelial carcinoma.

One such platform is Cxbladder. It is sometimes informally called “Cx View,” but the established commercial name is Cxbladder. The version designed for patients who already have a history of urothelial cancer is Cxbladder Monitor.

Cxbladder can provide useful additional information, particularly when the clinical question is whether cancer is unlikely to be present. However, it is not a stand-alone diagnosis, does not show where a tumour is located and should not automatically replace cystoscopy, imaging or biopsy.

What is the Cxbladder test?

Cxbladder is a non-invasive laboratory test performed on voided urine. It measures the expression of five messenger RNA biomarkers associated with urothelial carcinoma:

  • IGFBP5
  • HOXA13
  • MDK
  • CDK1
  • CXCR2

The result is calculated using a proprietary algorithm. Depending on the particular Cxbladder assay, clinical variables may also be incorporated into risk assessment.

The test looks for a molecular signal shed into urine by urothelial cancer cells. It does not provide a picture of the bladder, determine tumour size or location, reliably assign stage or grade, or replace histopathological examination.

The different Cxbladder tests are not interchangeable

The name “Cxbladder” covers several tests developed for different clinical settings.

Cxbladder Triage

This is designed primarily to help identify patients with haematuria who have a low probability of urothelial cancer. It prioritises sensitivity and negative predictive value, accepting lower specificity.

Cxbladder Detect

This is intended to help identify urothelial cancer in patients undergoing diagnostic evaluation, such as those presenting with haematuria. It is not specifically designed for post-treatment surveillance.

Cxbladder Monitor

This is designed for patients with a previous diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma who are undergoing surveillance for recurrence. It is the most relevant assay for follow-up after treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Newer or region-specific Cxbladder combinations may use different algorithms and thresholds. Performance figures from one assay should not be transferred uncritically to another.

How is the sample collected?

The patient provides a voided urine sample into the supplied collection system. No catheter is normally required. The sample is stabilised and sent to a specialised laboratory for analysis.

Collection instructions must be followed carefully. Insufficient urine, incorrect handling, contamination, excessive delay or failure to use the correct collection container may produce an invalid or unreliable result. A repeat sample may occasionally be required.

What role can Cxbladder have in initial diagnosis?

For a patient with visible or microscopic haematuria, Cxbladder may help refine the estimated probability of urothelial cancer. A low-risk result can be reassuring, especially in a carefully selected lower-risk patient.

However, haematuria can be caused by bladder cancer, upper-tract urothelial cancer, renal cancer, urinary stones, infection, benign prostate bleeding and other conditions. A urine biomarker cannot evaluate all these causes. Depending on age, symptoms and risk factors, the patient may still require cystoscopy and upper-tract imaging.

Current guideline-based haematuria assessment is risk stratified. Urine markers may support shared decision-making in selected patients, but should not delay investigation of visible haematuria or replace a complete assessment in a patient at significant risk.

How may Cxbladder Monitor be used in surveillance?

After treatment of NMIBC, conventional surveillance may include:

  • cystoscopy;
  • urine cytology in selected intermediate- and high-risk patients;
  • upper-tract imaging when indicated; and
  • biopsy or TURBT when a suspicious lesion is found.

Cxbladder Monitor may be added to this pathway to help identify patients with a low probability of recurrent disease. In selected lower-risk situations, a negative result may support extending the interval to cystoscopy or avoiding an additional cystoscopy, provided this forms part of a urologist-directed protocol.

A positive result does not prove that a recurrence is present. It usually means that further assessment, commonly cystoscopy, and sometimes cytology, enhanced cystoscopy, imaging or biopsy is warranted.

The test should be used particularly cautiously in patients with previous high-grade disease, carcinoma in situ (CIS), recent positive cytology, new haematuria, concerning symptoms or a history suggesting a high risk of progression. Missing high-grade recurrence carries much greater consequences than postponing a procedure in a genuinely low-risk patient.

How accurate is Cxbladder Monitor?

Published validation data have generally shown that Cxbladder Monitor is better at ruling out recurrence than confirming it.

Across key validation studies, reported performance has been approximately:

  • sensitivity: 91–93%;
  • negative predictive value (NPV): 96–97%;
  • specificity: approximately 34–39%; and
  • positive predictive value (PPV): approximately 21% in some validation cohorts.

One comparative study reported sensitivity of 91% and NPV of 96% for Cxbladder Monitor, outperforming cytology, NMP22 and UroVysion FISH for sensitivity in that study population. Another validation reported sensitivity of 93% and NPV of 97%.

These results need careful interpretation.

What does a negative predictive value of 97% mean?

In a study population similar to the one in which that figure was measured, about 97 of every 100 patients with a negative result did not have a detected recurrence, while approximately three could still have disease.

It does not mean the test is “97% accurate” in every patient. NPV changes with the underlying prevalence of recurrence. It will usually look higher in a low-risk population and lower when recurrence is common.

Why is the positive predictive value relatively low?

When specificity is low, many patients with a positive result will not have cancer confirmed on the subsequent assessment. A positive test is therefore a prompt to investigate, not a cancer diagnosis.

Does it detect high-grade disease better?

Urine-based biomarkers often perform better for biologically active high-grade tumours than for very small low-grade recurrences. Nevertheless, no negative urine test can guarantee that high-grade tumour or CIS is absent. Study populations also differ in the proportions of low-grade, high-grade and recently treated patients, making direct comparisons difficult.

Important pitfalls

1. A negative result can be falsely reassuring

False negatives occur. Small, low-volume or intermittently shedding tumours may release too little RNA into the urine. A diluted or poorly collected sample may also reduce the signal. A negative result must not override visible haematuria, positive cytology, a suspicious cystoscopy or a high-risk clinical history.

2. A positive result is not proof of cancer

Because Monitor is deliberately designed to be sensitive, specificity is modest. A positive result may lead to cystoscopy or biopsy that finds no tumour. The test cannot identify the lesion’s location, stage or grade.

3. Infection, inflammation and recent instrumentation complicate interpretation

Urinary infection, stones, bleeding, recent cystoscopy, catheterisation, TURBT, intravesical BCG or chemotherapy can alter urinary cellular material and the clinical context. Cxbladder includes an inflammatory-associated marker intended to reduce this “background noise,” but real-world confounding is not eliminated. Testing should be timed and interpreted by the treating urologist.

4. The test does not examine the upper urinary tract

Urothelial cancer may arise in the ureter or renal pelvis. A urine result cannot localise a tumour or replace CT urography, ureteroscopy or other upper-tract evaluation when clinically indicated.

5. It does not replace pathology

Only tissue examination can determine tumour grade, assess invasion and guide definitive treatment. Cxbladder is a risk-stratification tool rather than a histological diagnosis.

6. Performance may not generalise perfectly

Some studies were supported by or involved investigators connected with the test manufacturer. Many validation cohorts were enriched for particular risk groups and may not reflect every Australian practice. Independent prospective studies, longer follow-up and trials showing that biomarker-guided surveillance preserves oncological outcomes are especially important.

7. “Fewer cystoscopies” is not the same as “no cystoscopies”

Real-world studies suggest that Cxbladder Monitor can reduce cystoscopy frequency in selected low-risk patients. This should not be extrapolated to high-risk NMIBC or used to abandon risk-based surveillance. Cystoscopy remains the direct method of inspecting the bladder and permits immediate biopsy or resection planning.

8. Cost and access vary

Availability, laboratory turnaround time, out-of-pocket cost and reimbursement vary by location and insurer. Australian patients should confirm current access and costs with their urologist and testing provider before collection.

How does it compare with urine cytology?

Urine cytology is highly specific for high-grade urothelial carcinoma but has limited sensitivity, particularly for low-grade tumours. Cxbladder Monitor generally has higher reported sensitivity and NPV, but substantially lower specificity.

The tests therefore answer slightly different questions:

  • cytology: a clearly positive result strongly raises concern for high-grade disease;
  • Cxbladder Monitor: a negative result may help identify a low probability of recurrence; and
  • cystoscopy: directly visualises the bladder and remains central to surveillance.

Combining information may be more useful than treating any one result in isolation.

What do international guidelines say?

Major guidelines acknowledge that urinary molecular markers are improving, but remain cautious about their routine use as complete substitutes for cystoscopy.

  • The AUA/SUO NMIBC guideline states that urinary biomarkers should not replace cystoscopic evaluation during surveillance. Markers may be used in selected settings, including assessment of an equivocal cytology result or response to intravesical BCG.
  • The EAU NMIBC guideline recognises that molecular urine tests may have a future role in reducing cystoscopy frequency, particularly in lower-risk surveillance, but notes that evidence and prospective implementation data remain insufficient for a universal marker-driven schedule.
  • Guideline recommendations evolve as new trials emerge; decisions should be based on the patient’s individual recurrence and progression risk rather than the availability of a test alone.

A practical, balanced approach

Cxbladder Monitor is most helpful when the question is: “Is recurrence sufficiently unlikely that we can safely reduce or postpone an invasive investigation in this particular patient?”

It is less useful as a stand-alone answer to: “Does this patient definitely have cancer, where is it, and how aggressive is it?”

For a carefully selected patient with previous low-risk NMIBC, no new symptoms and a negative Monitor result, a biomarker-informed surveillance plan may reduce unnecessary cystoscopies. For a patient with previous CIS or high-grade tumour, positive cytology, visible haematuria or a suspicious finding, conventional investigation should not be deferred because of a negative urine test.

The result is best interpreted alongside tumour history, grade and stage, time since treatment, cystoscopy findings, cytology, imaging and the patient’s preferences.


References

  1. Kavalieris L, O’Sullivan P, Frampton C, et al. Performance characteristics of a multigene urine biomarker test for monitoring for recurrent urothelial carcinoma in a multicenter study. J Urol. 2017;197(6):1419–1426. PubMed search
  2. Lotan Y, O’Sullivan P, Raman JD, et al. Clinical comparison of noninvasive urine tests for ruling out recurrent urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(8):531.e15–531.e22. PubMed search
  3. O’Sullivan P, Sharples K, Dalphin M, et al. A multigene urine test for the detection and stratification of bladder cancer in patients presenting with hematuria. J Urol. 2012;188(3):741–747. PubMed search
  4. Li KD, McLennan MT, Barocas DA, et al. Cxbladder Monitor testing to reduce cystoscopy frequency in patients with bladder cancer. J Urol. 2023. PubMed
  5. Konety B, Shore N, Kader AK, et al. Evaluation of Cxbladder and adjudication of atypical cytology and equivocal cystoscopy. Eur Urol. 2019;76(2):238–243. PubMed search
  6. Darling D, Luxmanan C, O’Sullivan P, et al. Clinical utility of Cxbladder for the diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma. Adv Ther. 2017;34:1087–1096. PubMed search
  7. Breen V, Kasabov N, Kamat AM, et al. A holistic comparative analysis of diagnostic tests for urothelial carcinoma: a study of Cxbladder Detect, UroVysion FISH, NMP22 and cytology. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:27. Full text
  8. Harvey JC, et al. Analytical validation of Cxbladder Detect, Triage, and Monitor assays for detection and management of urothelial carcinoma. Diagnostics. 2024;14(18):2061. Full text
  9. Holzbeierlein JM, Bixler BR, Buckley DI, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. American Urological Association; amended 2024. AUA guideline
  10. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Current online edition. EAU guideline
  11. Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Matulewicz RS, et al. Updates to microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2025. PubMed

This article provides general information and does not replace personalised medical advice. Surveillance should be tailored to the original tumour’s stage and grade, prior treatment, current symptoms and the individual’s risk of recurrence and progression.

Superficial Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and the Risk of Progression

“Superficial bladder cancer” is an older term for cancer confined to the bladder lining or the tissue immediately beneath it. The preferred modern term is non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, usually abbreviated to NMIBC.

Although these cancers have not invaded the bladder muscle, they do not all behave in the same way. Some are small, low-grade tumours with a relatively low risk of causing serious harm. Others, particularly high-grade T1 cancer and carcinoma in situ, can recur frequently and may progress into the bladder muscle.

Accurate staging and risk classification are therefore essential when deciding between surveillance, intravesical treatment and removal of the bladder.

What is non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer?

The bladder wall consists of several layers. Most bladder cancers begin in the urothelium, the specialised lining on the inside of the bladder.

NMIBC includes three main stages:

  • Ta: a papillary tumour growing from the bladder lining without invading the supporting tissue
  • T1: cancer that has invaded the connective tissue beneath the lining but has not reached the bladder muscle
  • Carcinoma in situ/CIS or Tis: a flat, usually high-grade cancer confined to the bladder lining

CIS can be difficult to see because it may look like a red or inflamed area rather than a typical bladder tumour. Despite being confined to the surface, CIS is biologically aggressive and requires active treatment.

Once cancer enters the bladder muscle, it becomes muscle-invasive bladder cancer—stage T2 or higher. This usually requires a different and more intensive treatment approach.

How common is superficial bladder cancer?

Approximately 70–75% of bladder cancers are non–muscle-invasive when first diagnosed. The remaining patients generally have muscle-invasive or metastatic disease at presentation.

Bladder cancer is considerably more common in men than women and occurs most frequently in people over 60. Women sometimes experience delays in diagnosis when blood in the urine is initially attributed to urinary infection.

Most bladder cancers are urothelial carcinomas. Less common types include squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and small-cell or neuroendocrine carcinoma.

What symptoms can bladder cancer cause?

The most common presentation is visible blood in the urine, haematuria.

The urine may appear:

  • Pink
  • Red
  • Rust-coloured
  • Tea-coloured
  • Normal between episodes

The bleeding is often painless and may disappear for days or weeks. Its disappearance does not mean the underlying problem has resolved.

Other possible symptoms include:

  • Microscopic blood detected on a urine test
  • Urinary frequency
  • A sudden need to urinate
  • Burning or discomfort when passing urine
  • Recurrent symptoms resembling a urinary tract infection
  • Difficulty emptying the bladder
  • Pelvic discomfort

CIS may cause urinary urgency, frequency and burning without producing a large visible tumour.

Blood in the urine should always be investigated, particularly in an older adult or someone with a history of smoking. Infection, stones and benign prostate enlargement are common alternative explanations, but bladder and upper urinary tract cancers must be excluded.

What causes bladder cancer?

Bladder cancer develops when genetic damage causes cells in the bladder lining to grow abnormally. In many patients there is no single identifiable cause.

Cigarette smoking

Smoking is the most important preventable risk factor. Carcinogens from tobacco enter the bloodstream, are filtered by the kidneys and remain in contact with the bladder lining in the urine.

The risk increases with the amount and duration of smoking. Stopping smoking remains valuable even after diagnosis because continued smoking may increase the risk of recurrence and progression.

Occupational chemical exposure

Long-term exposure to certain aromatic amines and industrial chemicals can increase risk. Historically, higher-risk industries have included:

  • Dye and pigment manufacturing
  • Rubber and leather production
  • Painting
  • Printing
  • Metal processing
  • Petroleum and chemical industries

Modern workplace protections have reduced—but not eliminated—these exposures.

Other risk factors

Additional risk factors include:

  • Increasing age
  • Male sex
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy
  • Previous cyclophosphamide chemotherapy
  • Chronic bladder irritation or inflammation
  • Long-term urinary catheterisation
  • Certain inherited cancer syndromes, particularly Lynch syndrome
  • A personal history of cancer elsewhere in the urinary tract

Bladder cancer is not generally considered hereditary, although familial and genetic risks exist in a minority of patients.

How is bladder cancer investigated?

Medical history and urine testing

Assessment begins with a history of the bleeding, urinary symptoms, smoking and occupational exposure. Urine testing may identify blood, infection or abnormal cells.

A negative urine test after an episode of visible haematuria does not remove the need for investigation.

Urine cytology

Urine cytology examines shed urinary cells under a microscope.

It is most useful for detecting:

  • High-grade urothelial cancer
  • Carcinoma in situ
  • Cancer elsewhere in the urinary tract

Cytology is less sensitive for low-grade tumours, so a negative result does not exclude bladder cancer.

Urinary molecular-marker tests may occasionally provide additional information, but they do not usually replace cystoscopy.

Imaging of the urinary tract

A CT urogram is commonly used to assess:

  • Kidneys
  • Renal pelvises
  • Ureters
  • Bladder
  • Enlarged lymph nodes or other abnormalities

An ultrasound may be appropriate for selected patients, particularly when CT contrast or radiation should be avoided. However, ultrasound cannot reliably exclude small bladder tumours or CIS.

Flexible cystoscopy

A flexible cystoscope is passed through the urethra under local anaesthetic to inspect the bladder directly.

If a suspicious lesion is found, the next step is generally a formal resection under anaesthesia.

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour: TURBT

TURBT is the central procedure for diagnosing and treating NMIBC.

A rigid telescope is passed through the urethra, and the visible tumour is removed using an electrical loop, bipolar instrument or other resection technique. Tissue is sent to a pathologist to determine:

  • Cancer type
  • Tumour grade
  • Depth of invasion
  • Whether bladder muscle is present in the specimen
  • Whether muscle invasion has occurred
  • Whether variant histology or lymphovascular invasion is present

A complete TURBT should remove all visible tumour where safely possible and include adequate sampling of the underlying bladder muscle.

Enhanced cystoscopy using blue-light fluorescence or narrow-band imaging may help identify small tumours or CIS in selected patients.

When is a second TURBT required?

A repeat resection, usually within approximately two to six weeks, may be recommended when:

  • The first resection was incomplete
  • No bladder muscle was present in the specimen, apart from selected clearly low-risk Ta tumours
  • The tumour is high-grade T1
  • There is uncertainty about staging
  • Residual tumour is suspected

Repeat TURBT may find residual cancer and occasionally identifies previously unrecognised muscle invasion. It can therefore materially change treatment.

Understanding low-, intermediate-, high- and very-high-risk disease

Treatment is based on more than the word “superficial.” Important risk factors include:

  • Ta, T1 or CIS stage
  • Low-grade or high-grade pathology
  • Number of tumours
  • Tumour size
  • First occurrence or recurrence
  • Frequency of previous recurrences
  • Presence of CIS
  • Depth and extent of T1 invasion
  • Variant histology
  • Lymphovascular invasion
  • Involvement of the prostatic urethra
  • Response to previous BCG treatment

Low-risk NMIBC

This usually involves a first, solitary, small, low-grade Ta tumour without CIS.

These cancers commonly recur but have a very low risk of progressing to muscle-invasive disease.

Intermediate-risk NMIBC

This is a broad group between low and high risk. It may include recurrent, multiple or larger low-grade tumours and selected other tumours without high-risk features.

The pattern and frequency of recurrence help determine treatment intensity.

High-risk NMIBC

High-risk disease includes most:

  • High-grade T1 tumours
  • Carcinoma in situ
  • High-grade Ta tumours with adverse features
  • Tumours with other aggressive pathological findings

These cancers have a meaningful risk of entering the bladder muscle and require more intensive treatment and surveillance.

Very-high-risk NMIBC

Very-high-risk disease may include combinations such as extensive high-grade T1 cancer with CIS, lymphovascular invasion, certain aggressive variant histologies or involvement of the prostatic urethra.

For these patients, early radical cystectomy may provide the best chance of cure.

Initial treatment after TURBT

Surveillance for selected low-risk disease

For a completely removed low-risk tumour, treatment may consist of:

  • TURBT
  • A single immediate dose of intravesical chemotherapy when safe
  • Follow-up cystoscopy

Small, recurrent low-grade tumours may sometimes be treated with office fulguration or carefully selected surveillance, depending on the patient and tumour history.

Intravesical treatment

“Intravesical” means that a medication is placed directly into the bladder through a catheter. The medicine is retained for a prescribed time and then drained or passed in the urine.

Because the treatment remains mainly inside the bladder, it generally causes fewer whole-body effects than intravenous chemotherapy.

The role of intravesical mitomycin C

Mitomycin C is a chemotherapy medicine that damages the DNA of rapidly dividing cancer cells.

A single immediate postoperative dose

A single dose may be placed into the bladder shortly after TURBT—preferably within 24 hours—when the procedure has been uncomplicated.

Its purpose is to destroy floating tumour cells and reduce the chance that they implant elsewhere in the bladder. It also treats microscopic tumour cells remaining at the resection site.

This treatment is particularly useful for low-risk tumours and selected intermediate-risk tumours.

Mitomycin should not be administered immediately when there is:

  • Suspected bladder perforation
  • A very deep or extensive resection
  • Significant ongoing bleeding
  • A need for continuous bladder irrigation
  • Concern that the drug could leak outside the bladder

A course of mitomycin

Patients with intermediate-risk disease may receive weekly mitomycin treatments followed by a variable maintenance schedule. The exact schedule depends on tumour characteristics, previous recurrence pattern and local protocol.

Side effects of mitomycin

Possible side effects include:

  • Burning when urinating
  • Urinary frequency and urgency
  • Bladder discomfort
  • Blood in the urine
  • Chemical cystitis
  • Skin irritation or a rash involving the hands or genital region
  • Reduced bladder capacity after repeated severe inflammation
  • Infection
  • Rare injury if the medication leaks outside the bladder

Patients should follow the treatment unit’s instructions regarding fluid intake, urine handling and washing after treatment.

The role of intravesical BCG

BCG, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin, is a live, weakened form of Mycobacterium bovis. It was originally developed as a tuberculosis vaccine but also stimulates a powerful immune response against bladder cancer cells.

BCG is generally the preferred bladder-preserving treatment for:

  • Carcinoma in situ
  • High-risk high-grade Ta cancer
  • High-grade T1 cancer after adequate resection
  • Selected recurrent or aggressive intermediate-risk tumours

How is BCG given?

The usual initial course consists of one bladder instillation each week for six weeks. This is called induction BCG.

Patients who respond may then receive maintenance BCG. For high-risk disease, treatment may continue intermittently for one to three years, depending on tolerance, availability and individual risk.

Maintenance therapy is important because induction BCG alone provides less durable protection against recurrence and progression.

Side effects of BCG

Common short-term effects include:

  • Burning when urinating
  • Frequency and urgency
  • Mild blood in the urine
  • Bladder discomfort
  • Fatigue
  • Low-grade fever
  • Flu-like symptoms

These effects usually settle within one or two days.

Less common but potentially serious complications include:

  • Severe bacterial urinary infection
  • Prostatitis
  • Epididymo-orchitis
  • Granulomatous inflammation
  • Joint inflammation
  • Hepatitis or pneumonitis
  • Systemic BCG infection or sepsis

A high or persistent fever, shaking chills, breathing difficulty, confusion or severe illness after BCG requires urgent medical assessment.

When should BCG be postponed or avoided?

BCG should not be given:

  • Within the early healing period after TURBT, generally the first two weeks
  • After traumatic catheterisation
  • When visible haematuria is present
  • During a symptomatic urinary tract infection
  • When bladder perforation is suspected
  • In some patients with significant immune suppression
  • When previous BCG caused a severe systemic reaction

BCG is handled differently from routine chemotherapy because it contains live bacteria. Patients must follow the treatment centre’s hygiene and urine-disposal instructions.

Mitomycin or BCG: which is better?

Neither treatment is best for every patient.

  • Low-risk disease: a single immediate chemotherapy instillation is usually sufficient after complete TURBT.
  • Intermediate-risk disease: a course of chemotherapy or one year of BCG may be considered according to recurrence and progression risk.
  • High-risk disease: induction and maintenance BCG is generally preferred when bladder preservation is appropriate.
  • Very-high-risk disease: early radical cystectomy should be discussed, although BCG may remain an option in carefully selected patients who understand the risk.

BCG is more effective than chemotherapy for preventing recurrence and progression in appropriately selected high-risk disease, particularly when maintenance BCG is completed. It also tends to cause more local and systemic side effects.

What is the chance of developing muscle-invasive cancer?

There is no single percentage that applies to every NMIBC patient.

Across all NMIBC categories, approximately 10–20% of patients may eventually develop muscle-invasive disease, but this average hides enormous differences between low- and high-risk tumours.

Using contemporary EAU risk categories, estimated five-year progression risks can range approximately from:

  • Around 1% or less for low-risk disease
  • Several per cent for intermediate-risk disease
  • Around 10% or higher for high-risk disease
  • Approximately 40% or more for very-high-risk disease

At ten years, the estimated risk in very-high-risk patients may exceed 50% without effective additional treatment. These figures are estimates from risk models and do not precisely predict an individual patient’s outcome. BCG, repeat resection, early cystectomy and other treatments can substantially change the risk.

Progression risk is particularly concerning with:

  • Persistent or recurrent high-grade T1 cancer
  • T1 cancer associated with CIS
  • Extensive or multifocal CIS
  • Deep invasion into the lamina propria
  • Lymphovascular invasion
  • Aggressive variant histology
  • Prostatic urethral involvement
  • Failure to respond to adequate BCG
  • Early high-grade recurrence following BCG

Recurrence and progression are different. A small low-grade Ta tumour may recur several times without becoming muscle invasive, while a high-grade T1 tumour may progress after relatively few visible recurrences.

What is BCG-unresponsive bladder cancer?

BCG-unresponsive disease is a specific high-risk situation in which high-grade cancer persists or returns despite an adequate course of BCG within a defined period.

Continuing the same BCG treatment in genuinely BCG-unresponsive disease is unlikely to provide meaningful benefit and could delay curative surgery.

For a patient fit enough for major surgery, radical cystectomy is generally the preferred oncological treatment for BCG-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC.

Alternative bladder-preserving treatments or clinical trials may be considered when a patient:

  • Is medically unfit for cystectomy
  • Declines cystectomy after informed discussion
  • Has a strong preference for bladder preservation and accepts the additional risk

However, the possibility of losing the optimal window for curative surgery must be discussed clearly.

When should removal of the bladder be considered?

Radical cystectomy means removing the bladder, nearby lymph nodes and certain adjacent organs, followed by creating a new way for urine to leave the body.

It may be considered for NMIBC when there is:

  • Very-high-risk NMIBC at initial diagnosis
  • Persistent high-grade T1 cancer after repeat TURBT
  • High-grade T1 cancer with CIS
  • Lymphovascular invasion
  • Aggressive variant histology, such as micropapillary, plasmacytoid or selected sarcomatoid differentiation
  • Extensive CIS that does not respond adequately to BCG
  • High-grade recurrence following adequate BCG
  • BCG-unresponsive disease
  • Tumour involvement of the prostatic urethra or ducts
  • Disease that cannot be completely controlled endoscopically
  • Frequent, extensive high-grade recurrences
  • Progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Cystectomy may sound excessive for a cancer described as “superficial,” but high-grade T1 disease can already possess the biological ability to spread. Delaying surgery until muscle invasion or metastasis develops can reduce the chance of cure.

What does radical cystectomy involve?

In men, surgery commonly removes the:

  • Bladder
  • Prostate
  • Seminal vesicles
  • Pelvic lymph nodes

In women, surgery is tailored individually and may involve removal of the bladder, pelvic lymph nodes and selected reproductive organs. Organ-preserving approaches may be possible in carefully selected patients.

Urinary reconstruction options include:

  • Ileal conduit: urine drains through a short segment of bowel to a stoma and external bag
  • Orthotopic neobladder: bowel is used to create an internal reservoir connected to the urethra
  • Continent catheterisable reservoir: an internal pouch is emptied using a catheter through a small abdominal opening

The most appropriate option depends on cancer location, kidney function, bowel health, manual dexterity, general fitness and patient preference.

Radical cystectomy is major surgery. Potential effects on urinary, sexual and bowel function must be balanced against the danger of progression.

Why lifelong surveillance is important

NMIBC has a strong tendency to recur, even after apparently complete treatment. Follow-up commonly includes:

  • Regular cystoscopy
  • Urine cytology in higher-risk patients
  • Periodic upper urinary tract imaging
  • Biopsy or repeat TURBT when abnormalities are found
  • Monitoring for late treatment complications

Low-risk patients generally require less intensive surveillance. High-risk patients need frequent cystoscopy and cytology, particularly during the first two years, followed by long-term or lifelong monitoring.

The exact schedule should be tailored to the patient’s EAU risk group, pathology, treatment response and general health.

Can recurrence be prevented?

Not every recurrence can be prevented, but patients can improve their general and bladder health by:

  • Stopping smoking
  • Avoiding occupational carcinogen exposure
  • Completing recommended intravesical treatment
  • Attending every surveillance cystoscopy
  • Reporting recurrent blood in the urine promptly
  • Treating urinary infections appropriately
  • Maintaining good hydration unless medically restricted

Smoking cessation remains the most important modifiable step.

The bottom line

Most bladder cancers are diagnosed before they enter the bladder muscle, but the term “superficial” should not be mistaken for harmless.

Low-grade Ta tumours frequently recur but rarely progress. High-grade T1 cancer and CIS behave much more aggressively and require complete TURBT, appropriate intravesical therapy and close surveillance.

Mitomycin C is particularly useful for reducing recurrence after TURBT and treating selected low- or intermediate-risk disease. BCG is the main bladder-preserving treatment for high-risk NMIBC and CIS.

Radical cystectomy should be discussed early—not only after muscle invasion—in patients with very-high-risk features, persistent high-grade T1 cancer or BCG-unresponsive disease. For these patients, timely surgery may offer the best chance of cure.

This article provides general information and does not replace individual medical advice. Treatment should be based on formal pathology review, complete staging, medical fitness and multidisciplinary discussion.

References and further reading

So, if you are experiencing blood in your urine and have been identified by your GP as having a possible bladder cancer, come see your Urologist in Brisbane, Dr Jo Schoeman to discuss options with you.