Tag Archive for: Urinary Incontinence

Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Before and After Prostate Surgery

August 21, 2026/0 Comments/in Blog Post, Urinary Incontinence/by drjo

Preparing the Pelvic Floor for Recovery

Urinary leakage is one of the most common concerns men have when preparing for prostate surgery, particularly radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Fortunately, urinary control usually improves progressively after surgery, and pelvic floor rehabilitation can play an important role in helping men regain continence.

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is more than simply “doing Kegels”. It involves learning which muscles to use, how to contract them correctly, when to relax them, and how to incorporate them into everyday activities.

Importantly, more exercise is not necessarily better. The aim is a pelvic floor that is strong, coordinated and responsive, rather than one that is constantly clenched.

What Is the Male Pelvic Floor?

The pelvic floor is a group of muscles forming a supportive sling beneath the pelvis. These muscles contribute to:

urinary continence;
bowel control;
support of the pelvic organs;
sexual function; and
control of pressure generated during coughing, lifting and physical activity.

After radical prostatectomy, the anatomy of the urinary continence mechanism changes. The prostate and prostatic urethra are removed and the bladder is reconnected to the remaining urethra. Urinary control consequently becomes more dependent upon the remaining urinary sphincter and its supporting pelvic floor musculature.

This is why pelvic floor rehabilitation is particularly relevant after prostate cancer surgery.

Why Start Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Before Surgery?

Ideally, pelvic floor rehabilitation begins before the operation.

The principal advantage of pre-operative training is not necessarily building dramatically stronger muscles. Rather, it gives the patient an opportunity to identify and correctly activate the pelvic floor before surgery, when there is no catheter, discomfort or postoperative urinary leakage.

Evidence regarding whether pre-operative pelvic floor muscle training independently improves long-term continence rates is mixed. Current European guidelines conclude that pre-operative training has not consistently demonstrated an additional long-term benefit. However, pelvic floor muscle training after radical prostatectomy may shorten the time taken to recover continence.

For many patients, a consultation with a physiotherapist experienced in men’s pelvic health before surgery is therefore useful.

Finding the Correct Pelvic Floor Muscles

A pelvic floor contraction should feel as though you are trying to:

stop yourself passing wind while simultaneously shortening or drawing the penis slightly inward and lifting the scrotum.

The movement should be subtle.

During the contraction:

continue breathing normally;
avoid holding your breath;
keep the abdomen relatively relaxed;
avoid strongly squeezing the buttocks;
avoid excessive tightening of the thighs; and
completely relax the pelvic floor between contractions.

Some men find the correct muscles immediately. Others inadvertently brace their abdominal, buttock or thigh muscles.

This is one reason why an assessment by a pelvic floor physiotherapist can be valuable.

Should I stop my urine flow to find the muscles?

Stopping the urinary stream once can sometimes help identify the muscles involved, but repeatedly practising pelvic floor exercises by interrupting urination is generally not recommended.

Regularly stopping and starting the stream can interfere with normal bladder emptying.

A Practical Pelvic Floor Exercise Programme

There is no single exercise prescription that is perfect for every man. Pelvic floor strength, endurance, coordination and postoperative continence vary considerably.

A physiotherapist may therefore modify the programme according to your examination and progress.

A typical programme contains several components.

1. Slow contractions: strength and endurance

Gently contract and lift the pelvic floor.

Hold the contraction for approximately:

5–10 seconds

Then relax completely for approximately:

5–10 seconds

Repeat approximately:

8–10 times

The quality of the contraction is more important than achieving a particular number.

If you can only maintain a good contraction for three seconds initially, three good seconds are preferable to ten seconds of straining.

2. Quick contractions

The urinary sphincter also needs to react rapidly.

Contract the pelvic floor firmly for approximately one second, then completely release it.

Repeat:

5–10 times

These faster contractions help train the pelvic floor to respond to sudden increases in abdominal pressure.

3. The “Knack”

One of the most useful techniques is learning to contract the pelvic floor immediately before an activity that normally produces leakage.

For example, gently activate the pelvic floor just before:

coughing;
sneezing;
standing from a chair;
bending;
lifting;
getting out of a car; or
performing physical exercise.

This anticipatory contraction is sometimes called the Knack.

It turns pelvic floor training from an isolated exercise into a functional skill.

How Often Should I Exercise?

This is where the principle of quality rather than quantity becomes important.

For many men, a structured programme performed two to three times per day is sufficient during active rehabilitation.

A session might consist of:

8–10 controlled slow contractions followed by 5–10 quick contractions.

However, this should not be regarded as a universal prescription. Your physiotherapist or surgeon may recommend a different programme according to your muscle strength, continence and ability to relax the pelvic floor.

The pelvic floor is skeletal muscle. Like other muscles, it needs work, recovery and progression.

Doing hundreds of contractions every day is rarely necessary.

Can You Do Too Many Pelvic Floor Exercises?

Yes.

One of the common misconceptions after prostate surgery is:

“If ten exercises are good, one hundred must be better.”

Unfortunately, pelvic floor muscles can become fatigued just like any other muscle.

Excessive training or constantly holding the pelvic floor contracted can potentially cause:

pelvic or perineal discomfort;
difficulty relaxing the pelvic floor;
urinary urgency;
difficulty starting urination;
interrupted urinary flow;
a sensation of incomplete bladder emptying;
pelvic muscle fatigue; and
occasionally worsening leakage later in the day as the muscles tire.

A healthy pelvic floor needs to be able to contract strongly and relax completely.

Continence does not require walking around all day with the pelvic floor permanently switched on.

How Do I Know When I Am Doing Enough?

Your programme is probably adequate when you can:

identify the pelvic floor reliably;
contract it without excessive abdominal or buttock activity;
maintain several controlled contractions without losing strength;
completely relax between contractions;
activate the muscles quickly before coughing or lifting; and
progressively incorporate pelvic floor control into normal activities.

Progress after prostatectomy is often better measured by continence rather than the number of exercises performed.

Useful measures include:

number of pads used each day;
degree of pad wetness;
a 24-hour pad-weight test;
leakage during walking or exercise;
ability to remain dry overnight;
ability to reach the toilet without leakage; and
changes over several weeks rather than from one day to the next.

When Should Exercises Restart After Surgery?

Follow the instructions given by your surgeon.

Pelvic floor contractions are usually stopped while the urinary catheter is in place.

Training can generally recommence after catheter removal once your surgical team considers it appropriate. European guidance notes that pelvic floor muscle training is commonly started approximately 7–10 days after catheter removal, although individual postoperative protocols vary.

Early exercises should be gentle.

This is not the time to test how hard you can squeeze.

As healing progresses, the programme can gradually move from basic contractions to functional training while standing, walking, coughing, lifting and exercising.

What Should I Expect After the Catheter Comes Out?

The first few days can be confronting.

Some men have relatively little leakage immediately. Others experience considerable leakage, particularly when:

standing;
walking;
coughing;
exercising;
getting out of a chair; or
becoming tired later in the day.

This does not necessarily predict the final outcome.

Continence often improves substantially during the first weeks and months following radical prostatectomy.

Recovery is a marathon measured in millilitres rather than kilometres.

How Successful Is Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy?

This question is more complicated than it initially appears.

Urinary continence frequently improves naturally following prostatectomy, making it difficult for studies to separate the effect of pelvic floor physiotherapy from normal postoperative recovery.

The research is consequently mixed.

The European Association of Urology notes that systematic reviews and trials suggest pelvic floor muscle training can shorten the time to continence recovery, although the evidence regarding supervised training, biofeedback and additional therapies remains inconsistent.

For example, one randomised study cited by the EAU compared supervised physiotherapist-directed pelvic floor training with verbal and written instructions. At 12 months, complete pad-free continence was reported in 65.2% of the supervised group versus 31.6% of the comparison group. This result should not be interpreted as the expected success rate for every patient, because continence definitions, surgical techniques and rehabilitation programmes differ considerably between studies.

A 2023 Cochrane review was considerably more cautious. After reviewing 25 trials, the authors concluded that uncertainty remains regarding the magnitude of benefit from conservative treatments because studies vary considerably in their techniques, combinations of treatments and methodological quality.

The practical message is therefore:

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is an important first-line treatment and may accelerate recovery, but it cannot guarantee continence.

What If Pelvic Floor Exercises Are Not Working?

Persistent leakage does not automatically mean you need to exercise harder.

If continence is failing to improve, the first question should be:

Why am I leaking?

Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence may result from:

weakness of the urinary sphincter;
bladder overactivity;
urinary urgency;
incomplete bladder emptying;
bladder-neck or urethral narrowing;
a combination of stress and urgency incontinence; or
less commonly, other urinary tract problems.

The AUA guideline emphasises distinguishing stress incontinence, where leakage occurs with coughing, walking, lifting or exertion, from urgency incontinence, where leakage accompanies a sudden compelling desire to urinate.

No amount of extra squeezing will correct every one of these problems.

When Should Further Investigation Be Considered?

Further assessment may be appropriate when urinary leakage is:

severe;
worsening rather than improving;
associated with difficulty urinating;
associated with significant urgency or frequency;
persistent despite appropriate rehabilitation; or
sufficiently troublesome that surgical treatment is being considered.

Assessment may include:

Bladder diary

Records fluid intake, urinary frequency, urinary volumes and leakage episodes.

Pad-weight testing

Provides an objective measurement of the amount of urine being lost.

Urinary flow measurement and bladder ultrasound

Can identify poor urinary flow or incomplete bladder emptying.

Cystoscopy

May be recommended when urethral or bladder-neck pathology is suspected.

Urodynamic studies

Can sometimes help distinguish sphincter weakness from bladder dysfunction when the cause of persistent leakage is uncertain or before further treatment.

What Alternatives Are Available if Physiotherapy Is Not Enough?

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is only one part of managing post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Lifestyle and bladder strategies

These may include:

appropriate fluid intake;
reducing excessive caffeine;
avoiding constipation;
weight management where appropriate;
bladder training;
management of urinary urgency; and
modifying activities that provoke significant leakage during early recovery.

Continence pads

Modern male continence pads provide discreet protection while continence is recovering.

Using pads does not mean rehabilitation has failed. They are simply a tool for allowing normal activity during recovery.

Penile compression devices

A penile clamp can temporarily reduce leakage in selected men, although these devices must be fitted and used correctly and released regularly to avoid excessive pressure or tissue injury.

Medication

Medication does not generally correct true post-prostatectomy sphincter weakness.

However, medication may be useful when overactive bladder or urinary urgency contributes significantly to leakage.

Biofeedback

Biofeedback can help some patients understand whether they are contracting the correct muscles and how effectively they are doing so.

Electrical stimulation

Electrical stimulation has also been investigated. Some studies suggest an early benefit when combined with pelvic floor training, although evidence remains inconsistent.

When Is Surgery Considered?

A small proportion of men continue to experience significant stress urinary incontinence despite adequate healing and rehabilitation.

If the leakage remains bothersome, further treatment should be discussed rather than simply continuing increasingly intensive pelvic floor exercises indefinitely.

The two principal surgical options are:

Male Sling

A male sling supports and repositions the urethral continence mechanism.

It is generally most suitable for selected men with mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence and adequate residual sphincter function.

Results tend to be less favourable when incontinence is severe. The AUA guideline specifically notes that male sling outcomes are poorer in men with severe sphincteric incontinence.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains an important treatment for moderate to severe post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence.

A fluid-filled cuff is placed around the urethra and controlled by a small pump positioned within the scrotum. The patient operates the pump when he wishes to urinate.

Both male sling surgery and artificial urinary sphincter implantation can significantly reduce pad use and improve quality of life in appropriately selected men.

When Should I Stop Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation?

There is rarely a precise finishing date.

Once continence has returned and pelvic floor control is good, intensive rehabilitation can usually be reduced.

Many men transition from a rehabilitation programme to a simple maintenance programme, incorporating occasional pelvic floor exercises and functional contractions during activities that generate abdominal pressure.

If you are completely dry, have good pelvic floor control and can cough, lift and exercise without leakage, performing increasingly large numbers of exercises is unlikely to provide additional benefit.

The goal is not to become a professional Kegel athlete.

The goal is normal function.

The Bottom Line

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is an important component of recovery following radical prostatectomy.

Learning the technique before surgery can make it easier to identify and activate the correct muscles after the catheter is removed. Following surgery, a structured programme focusing on strength, endurance, rapid contractions, relaxation and functional activation may help accelerate the return of urinary control. Current evidence supports pelvic floor muscle training as part of postoperative management, while acknowledging that the precise additional benefit of intensive supervised physiotherapy remains uncertain.

Just as importantly, more is not always better. Persistent leakage should not automatically be treated with ever-increasing numbers of pelvic floor contractions.

If urinary incontinence remains troublesome despite appropriate rehabilitation, further assessment can determine whether the problem is persistent sphincter weakness, bladder dysfunction or another cause. Treatments ranging from bladder therapy and medication to a male sling or artificial urinary sphincter can then be considered.

A useful rule

Train the pelvic floor, don’t exhaust it.

Correct technique, consistency and functional control matter far more than the number of contractions performed.

This information is intended for general patient education and does not replace individual medical advice. The timing and intensity of pelvic floor rehabilitation should be discussed with your surgeon and/or a physiotherapist experienced in male pelvic health.

Fascia Lata Allograft as a Mid-Urethral Sling for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

August 19, 2026/0 Comments/in Blog Post, Incontinence Surgery/by drjo

A “new/revamped” kid on the block – Fascia Lata Allograft: A biological alternative to synthetic mesh

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is one of the most common forms of urinary incontinence in women. It occurs when urine leaks with activities that increase abdominal pressure, such as coughing, sneezing, laughing, exercising, lifting or running.

For women whose symptoms remain troublesome despite pelvic floor muscle training and appropriate conservative treatment, surgical treatment can provide substantial and durable improvement.

For many years, the mid-urethral sling has been one of the most effective minimally invasive surgical treatments for SUI. Synthetic mesh mid-urethral slings remain available in Australia and have extensive evidence supporting their effectiveness. However, concerns surrounding synthetic mesh have led many women to ask whether there is a biological alternative.

One such option is a fascia lata allograft, including the fascia lata allograft supplied by Samson Medical Technologies in Australia.

The important distinction is that the Samson product is not a synthetic mesh. It is human donor fascia lata, processed for use as a biological graft. Samson describes its current fascia lata allograft as 100% human-derived, without storage media, non-irradiated and processed using Super Critical CO₂ technology.

However, there is an important caveat: the published clinical evidence for fascia lata allografts in SUI largely relates to earlier cadaveric fascia products and pubovaginal sling techniques, rather than Samson’s current specific product. Therefore, the historical allograft results should not be presented as if they were Samson-specific clinical trial results.

What is an allograft sling?

An allograft is tissue obtained from a human donor rather than from the patient herself.

Traditional biological pubovaginal slings have commonly used the patient’s own rectus fascia or fascia lata. This provides a strong, durable biological support but requires an additional incision to harvest the patient’s tissue.

An allograft avoids this donor-site surgery.

The fascia lata is positioned beneath the urethra and secured to provide a supportive platform. During coughing, sneezing or physical exertion, the urethra is compressed against this support, helping prevent urine leakage.

The concept is therefore quite different from a synthetic polypropylene mid-urethral sling. Instead of leaving a permanent synthetic mesh implant, the surgeon is using processed human connective tissue.

Samson currently supplies fascia lata allografts in several dimensions, including 20 × 100 mm and 20 × 120–140 mm configurations.

How effective are fascia lata allografts?

This is where the evidence requires some careful interpretation.

There is a substantial historical literature examining cadaveric fascia lata as a sling material, but the results have been inconsistent.

Early studies

Some early studies reported excellent short-term results.

One study of 26 women treated with solvent-dehydrated cadaveric fascia lata reported that 77% were completely dry and 92% used one pad or fewer per day at a mean follow-up of 15 months.

Another series of 31 women reported complete resolution of SUI in 93% at approximately one year.

A larger series of 104 women using freeze-dried, non-irradiated cadaveric fascia lata demonstrated substantial reductions in pad use, although the study’s follow-up was relatively short.

These studies created considerable enthusiasm for allograft tissue because it offered the advantages of a biological sling without the morbidity of harvesting the patient’s own fascia.

But there was also a warning signal

Other studies produced considerably less encouraging results.

A study of 18 women using solvent-dehydrated, gamma-irradiated fascia lata found that 27.8% experienced significant failure, with recurrent incontinence occurring within 3–6 months. The authors concluded that this particular allograft material was unreliable.

A subsequent comparative study of 71 women found a concerning difference in objective urodynamic recurrence: urodynamic stress incontinence was present in 41.7% of women who received Tutoplast allograft compared with none of those receiving autologous fascia lata at follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes, however, were more favourable.

Other series have reported much better results. In a 134-patient comparison, 63 women received allograft fascia and 71 received autologous fascia. There was no statistically significant difference in overall cure of stress and urge incontinence at approximately two years, while the allograft group experienced less postoperative pain and disability.

What does this mean?

The historical evidence suggests that allograft fascia can work well, but the durability and consistency of older allograft products were variable.

This variability is important when discussing the Samson allograft. There is currently insufficient published comparative evidence to state that the Samson product has a specific cure rate such as 80%, 90% or 95%.

The more scientifically defensible statement is:

Samson fascia lata provides a contemporary biological allograft option for sling surgery, but Samson-specific long-term comparative clinical outcome data are still developing.

That distinction is important when counselling patients.

How does Samson allograft differ from older allografts?

The earlier allograft literature predominantly involved freeze-dried, solvent-dehydrated and/or gamma-irradiated cadaveric fascia lata.

The Samson product currently described by the manufacturer is different in its processing. Samson reports that its fascia lata is:

100% human-derived
non-irradiated
supplied without storage media
processed using Super Critical CO₂ technology
available in several sizes.

The rationale behind modern tissue processing is to preserve the structural characteristics of the collagenous tissue while making the graft suitable for implantation.

Nevertheless, a different processing technology does not automatically establish superior clinical continence outcomes. Laboratory characteristics, tensile strength and histological appearance are not substitutes for long-term clinical trials.

This is one of the areas where future Australian outcome data will be particularly valuable.

How does an allograft compare with synthetic mid-urethral mesh?

Synthetic mid-urethral slings have the largest evidence base of any minimally invasive SUI operation.

A Cochrane review including 81 trials and more than 12,000 women found that more than 80% of women were cured or significantly improved following mid-urethral sling surgery, with good results maintained for up to five years.

Retropubic and transobturator approaches have broadly comparable effectiveness, although their complication profiles differ.

For example, retropubic slings have a higher risk of bladder perforation, whereas transobturator procedures have more groin pain. Vaginal mesh exposure is uncommon but recognised with both approaches.

The Australian situation

It is important to distinguish mid-urethral slings from transvaginal mesh used for pelvic organ prolapse.

The Australian TGA has removed certain transvaginal mesh products from the market, particularly mesh used for prolapse and single-incision mini-slings. However, mid-urethral sling devices for SUI remain approved in Australia.

Indeed, a 2026 Australian Government review concluded that mid-urethral sling devices should remain on the Prescribed List, with their existing listing unchanged.

Therefore, synthetic MUS should not simply be described as “banned mesh” in Australia. It remains an accepted treatment for appropriately selected women.

Potential advantages of an allograft

A biological fascia lata sling potentially offers:

Advantages

No synthetic polypropylene mesh
No fascial harvest from the patient’s abdomen or thigh
Avoidance of donor-site pain
Biological rather than permanent synthetic material
Potentially useful where avoidance of synthetic mesh is an important patient preference

Potential disadvantages

Less robust long-term evidence than synthetic MUS
Historical allograft studies have shown variable durability
It is still a surgical sling and can cause obstruction, urinary retention, infection, bleeding or pain
It requires more extensive dissection than a conventional MUS
It should not currently be marketed as proven superior to synthetic MUS

What about the Burch colposuspension?

The Burch colposuspension is the classic non-mesh surgical treatment for SUI.

Rather than placing a sling beneath the urethra, sutures are placed beside the bladder neck and proximal urethra and attached to supporting pelvic tissues.

It can be performed by open or laparoscopic surgery.

Long-term studies demonstrate that Burch colposuspension can be highly effective. One classic study found an 81.6% cure rate at 5–10 years.

More contemporary comparative data are reassuring. In a large study with more than 1,300 women and long-term follow-up, the proportion reporting no ongoing SUI was 83.0% after Burch colposuspension compared with 85.0% following retropubic MUS, with no significant difference.

However, Burch surgery is more invasive than a mid-urethral sling and is generally no longer the first surgical option for uncomplicated primary SUI.

It can nevertheless be an attractive option in selected women, particularly when avoiding synthetic mesh is important.

What about peri-urethral bulking agents?

Urethral bulking agents occupy a completely different part of the treatment spectrum.

A material is injected into the urethral wall around the bladder neck or proximal urethra to increase coaptation and improve continence.

In Australia, polyacrylamide hydrogel such as Bulkamid is an established example.

The major attraction is that it is substantially less invasive than sling surgery.

It can often be performed under local anaesthesia or sedation and has a relatively favourable safety profile.

The trade-off is effectiveness and durability.

A 2024 study of Bulkamid reported that at 12 months 69% of women described themselves as cured or improved, with 40% reporting cure, while 23% underwent subsequent treatment, including repeat Bulkamid injection or MUS.

Longer-term data are more modest. In a cohort of 357 women followed for a median of approximately 2.5 years, subjective cure was 30.9%, while 52.1% reported improvement. Minor adverse events occurred in 21%, with no serious adverse events attributed to the procedure.

Current guideline evidence therefore generally considers bulking agents less effective than MUS, Burch colposuspension or autologous fascial sling surgery, and repeat injections may be necessary.

Putting the options together

Treatment	Approximate effectiveness	Main advantages	Main disadvantages
Samson fascia lata allograft sling	Samson-specific long-term cure rate not yet established; historical allograft studies range widely	Biological tissue; no synthetic mesh; no tissue harvest	Limited contemporary comparative evidence; historical allograft durability concerns; surgical sling risks
Synthetic mid-urethral sling	Generally >80% cure/improvement in medium-term evidence	Minimally invasive, rapid recovery, extensive evidence	Mesh-specific complications including exposure, pain and voiding dysfunction
Burch colposuspension	Approximately 70–85% long-term continence in many series	No vaginal mesh; durable native-tissue operation	More invasive; longer recovery; risk of prolapse and voiding problems
Autologous fascial sling	Generally high effectiveness, comparable with other established sling procedures	No synthetic mesh; patient’s own tissue	Requires tissue harvest; more postoperative morbidity
Bulking agent	Lower cure rate, but meaningful improvement for many women	Minimally invasive; useful for frail/high-risk patients or those avoiding sling surgery	Less durable; repeat injections commonly required

The Australian Government’s own review of MUS specifically considered colposuspension, native-tissue pubovaginal slings and urethral bulking agents as important comparators.

Who might consider an allograft sling?

A fascia lata allograft may be particularly attractive for a woman who:

has objectively demonstrated SUI;
has failed appropriate conservative treatment;
wishes to avoid a permanent synthetic mesh implant;
does not want an abdominal or thigh incision to harvest her own fascia;
understands that the long-term evidence base for contemporary allograft products is smaller than that for synthetic MUS;
accepts that biological tissue does not eliminate the risks associated with sling surgery.

It may also have a role in selected women with recurrent SUI, particularly where previous synthetic mesh surgery makes another synthetic procedure unattractive. However, recurrent SUI is a more complex clinical situation and requires individual assessment.

The important question: is Samson allograft better than synthetic mesh?

At present, there is not enough evidence to say that it is.

The strongest evidence remains with synthetic mid-urethral slings. Their effectiveness has been demonstrated in thousands of women and across multiple randomised trials and systematic reviews.

The potential attraction of Samson fascia lata is different.

It offers a biological alternative for women who would prefer to avoid synthetic mesh while also avoiding the morbidity of harvesting their own fascia.

That makes it an interesting addition to the surgeon’s toolbox rather than a replacement for the established mid-urethral sling.

The key unanswered question is long-term durability.

Historical cadaveric allograft studies demonstrate that some allografts performed extremely well, while others experienced substantial early failure.

Consequently, contemporary prospective data specifically evaluating Samson’s processing technology, clinical continence outcomes, complications and durability would be valuable.

What should a woman expect from the procedure?

As with any continence operation, the goal is not simply to make a stress test negative. The aim is to improve the woman’s quality of life while preserving normal bladder emptying and sexual function.

Potential complications of sling surgery include:

temporary or persistent difficulty emptying the bladder;
urinary retention requiring catheterisation;
urinary tract infection;
bleeding or haematoma;
pain;
de novo urgency or worsening overactive bladder;
recurrent or persistent SUI;
vaginal wound problems;
infection;
rarely, injury to the bladder, urethra or surrounding structures.

Synthetic mesh has additional mesh-specific risks, including vaginal exposure/erosion and chronic pain. The TGA specifically requires information regarding complications such as severe chronic pain, groin pain and bladder perforation in the instructions for use of Australian MUS devices.

An allograft avoids synthetic mesh exposure, but it does not make the operation risk-free.

The bottom line

For a woman with bothersome stress urinary incontinence, there is no single operation that is right for everyone.

Synthetic mid-urethral slings remain the most extensively studied minimally invasive surgical treatment and have excellent success rates.

Burch colposuspension remains a durable non-mesh alternative, although it is more invasive.

Bulking agents offer the least invasive surgical option but generally have lower and less durable success rates.

Fascia lata allograft represents an intriguing middle ground: a biological sling that avoids both synthetic mesh and the need to harvest the patient’s own fascia.

The Samson allograft is particularly interesting because its contemporary processing differs from several of the older cadaveric fascia products that generated the historical literature. Samson describes its current graft as non-irradiated human fascia lata processed using Super Critical CO₂ technology.

However, the enthusiasm should be matched by scientific caution. The historical literature demonstrates that allografts can achieve good continence outcomes, but it also demonstrates that not all allograft materials have behaved identically over time.

For patients considering this option, the most accurate discussion is therefore not “this is a better sling than mesh.” It is:

“This is a biological alternative to synthetic mesh, with encouraging historical experience but less mature long-term clinical evidence for the contemporary product.”

As further Australian experience and prospective follow-up accumulate, Samson fascia lata allograft may become an increasingly useful option in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Important note

This article is intended for general information and does not replace an individual assessment by a urologist or uro-gynaecologist. The choice between conservative management, bulking agent, synthetic MUS, biological or autologous sling and Burch colposuspension depends on the type and severity of incontinence, previous surgery, urethral function, pelvic anatomy, patient preference and overall health.

Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence

August 19, 2026/0 Comments/in Blog Post, Incontinence Surgery/by drjo

When urine leakage persists after prostate surgery

Urinary leakage after prostatectomy is common, particularly in the first few weeks and months following surgery. For most men, bladder control progressively improves as the urinary sphincter and pelvic floor recover.

For some men, however, leakage persists and can become a significant physical, social and emotional burden.

The good news is that persistent post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence is treatable, and there are several options ranging from pelvic floor rehabilitation through to highly effective surgical treatments.

What is post-prostatectomy incontinence?

Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) refers to involuntary leakage of urine following surgery to remove the prostate, most commonly radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

The most common form is stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

You may notice leakage when:

Coughing or sneezing
Standing up
Walking or exercising
Lifting something heavy
Getting out of a chair or car
Bending over
Playing sport
During sexual activity or orgasm

Some men also experience urgency urinary incontinence, where a sudden compelling desire to urinate is followed by leakage.

Others have a combination of stress and urgency incontinence.

Why does this happen?

The prostate sits immediately below the bladder and surrounds the urethra. The urinary sphincter mechanism is therefore intimately involved with prostate surgery.

After prostatectomy, continence depends on the remaining external sphincter, pelvic floor muscles and the way the bladder stores and releases urine.

Recovery is a process rather than an on/off switch.

Most men experience substantial improvement during the first year, although the rate and extent of recovery varies between individuals. A small proportion of men continue to have bothersome leakage that requires active treatment.

How severe is the leakage?

The first step is to understand exactly what type of leakage you have and how much urine you are losing.

A consultation should look at:

1. Your symptoms

We want to know:

When did the leakage begin?
Is it improving, stable or getting worse?
Does it occur with coughing, movement or exercise?
Do you experience urgency?
How frequently do you urinate?
Do you get up at night?
Do you have difficulty emptying your bladder?
Do you leak during sexual activity or orgasm?
How much does the problem interfere with your lifestyle?

A validated questionnaire such as the ICIQ-UI Short Form can provide a standardised measure of symptoms and their impact.

Objective assessment

It is useful to measure your incontinence rather than relying solely on how many pads you use.

Different men use different numbers of pads, and a pad that is changed for comfort may contain very little urine.

Pad weight testing

A pad weight test provides a more objective measurement of urine loss.

The principle is simple:

1 gram increase in pad weight ≈ 1 mL of urine.

Depending on the clinical question, testing can be performed over a defined period or as a 24-hour pad weight assessment during normal daily activities.

For example:

Dry pads: 250 g
Used pads: 650 g

Urine loss = 400 g ≈ 400 mL

Pad testing can help:

Quantify the severity of leakage
Establish a baseline
Monitor improvement
Compare the result before and after treatment

Pad weight testing is recommended as one of the objective tools for assessing male urinary incontinence.

Why pad weight can be more useful than “number of pads”

One man’s “three pads a day” may represent a few drops on each pad.

Another man’s three pads may be completely saturated.

The number of pads therefore tells only part of the story.

The weight tells us how much urine is actually being lost.

Bladder diary

A 3-day bladder diary can be remarkably informative.

You record:

What and how much you drink
Time of each drink
Time of each urination
Volume passed
Urgency
Episodes of leakage
Activity associated with leakage
Pad changes
Night-time urination

The diary helps identify patterns that may not be obvious during a consultation.

It can distinguish, for example, between:

“I am leaking because my sphincter is weak”

and

“I am leaking because my bladder is filling rapidly and becoming overactive.”

Bladder diaries are an established method for objectively assessing frequency, voided volumes, urine production and urinary leakage.

Ultrasound assessment

An ultrasound examination can provide important additional information.

A particularly useful measurement is the post-void residual (PVR).

This tells us how much urine remains in the bladder after you have urinated.

Why does this matter?

Persistent urine in the bladder may indicate:

Poor bladder emptying
Bladder outlet obstruction
Reduced bladder contractility
Dysfunctional voiding

Ultrasound may also be used to assess the urinary tract and, where clinically appropriate, investigate other anatomical abnormalities.

Measurement of PVR is recommended in the assessment of male urinary incontinence.

Urodynamic testing

Sometimes the bladder and sphincter need to be examined in considerably more detail.

This is where urodynamics can be extremely useful.

Urodynamic testing measures how the bladder and urethra behave during filling and emptying.

It can assess:

Bladder capacity
Bladder sensation
Bladder compliance
Detrusor overactivity
Bladder pressure
Urinary flow
Bladder emptying
Sphincter function
Stress leakage
Bladder outlet obstruction

Why is this important?

Not all post-prostatectomy leakage is caused by the same problem.

A man may have:

Sphincter weakness

Overactive bladder

Poor bladder compliance

Impaired bladder contractility

or a combination of these.

Urodynamics can help distinguish bladder dysfunction from sphincteric insufficiency and can be particularly useful when the diagnosis is uncertain, bladder emptying is abnormal, or invasive treatment is being considered.

Urodynamics is not necessarily required for every man with straightforward stress incontinence.

It should be used selectively when the results are likely to influence diagnosis, counselling or treatment.

Pelvic floor muscle training

The pelvic floor is part of your continence mechanism

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is an important component of recovery after prostatectomy.

The pelvic floor muscles help support the urethra and contribute to urinary control.

The aim is not simply to perform hundreds of random “Kegels”.

Effective rehabilitation involves learning to:

Identify the correct muscles
Contract them correctly
Hold the contraction
Relax completely
Coordinate the contraction with movement and changes in abdominal pressure
Use the muscles appropriately during activities that trigger leakage

A specialised pelvic floor physiotherapist can be extremely helpful.

Timing matters

Pelvic floor exercises can be started before prostatectomy and should be continued after surgery.

Following catheter removal, pelvic floor muscle exercises or formal pelvic floor muscle training should be offered to men recovering from radical prostatectomy. Evidence suggests that they can accelerate the return of continence, particularly during the earlier stages of recovery.

However, pelvic floor exercises are not a magic switch.

If significant stress incontinence persists despite appropriate rehabilitation, it is important to reassess the situation rather than simply continuing exercises indefinitely.

When should surgery be considered?

Continence often continues to improve during the first year after prostatectomy.

For men with bothersome stress urinary incontinence who are not improving despite conservative treatment, surgical treatment can be considered from around six months, particularly when the incontinence is severe.

For persistent bothersome incontinence, surgical treatment should generally be offered by approximately 12 months rather than waiting indefinitely for further spontaneous improvement.

The exact timing should be individualised.

Surgical treatment

There is no single operation that is right for every man.

The choice depends on:

Severity of leakage
Pad weight
Time since prostatectomy
Previous radiation therapy
Urethral anatomy
Bladder function
Previous continence surgery
Manual dexterity
Patient expectations and preferences

The major surgical options include:

1. Male sling

A male sling supports and/or repositions the urethra to improve urinary control.

It is generally most suitable for mild to moderate stress urinary incontinence.

A sling may be particularly attractive to men who:

Have relatively low-volume leakage
Have not received pelvic radiation
Have good bladder function
Prefer a treatment without a mechanical pump

However, male slings are not routinely recommended for severe stress incontinence, where outcomes are generally less reliable than with an artificial urinary sphincter.

2. Artificial urinary sphincter

For significant or severe post-prostatectomy stress incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the benchmark surgical treatment.

The device consists of:

A cuff around the urethra
A small control pump in the scrotum
A pressure-regulating balloon

When the cuff is inflated, the urethra is closed.

When you want to urinate, you squeeze the pump.

The cuff temporarily opens, allowing urine to pass.

It then automatically closes again.

Who is an AUS suitable for?

An AUS can be considered for men with mild through severe stress urinary incontinence, particularly when conservative treatment has failed.

Before implantation, the patient needs sufficient manual dexterity and cognitive ability to operate the device.

What are the disadvantages?

An AUS is a mechanical implant.

Potential complications include:

Infection
Urethral erosion
Mechanical failure
Persistent or recurrent leakage
Urethral atrophy
Need for revision or replacement

The device can provide excellent long-term continence, but patients should understand that it is not necessarily a “fit it and forget it” solution. Reoperations become more common as the device ages.

3. Adjustable continence devices

Adjustable balloon systems are another option in selected men.

These devices provide external compression around the urethra and can be adjusted following implantation.

They may be considered in selected patients, particularly those with mild incontinence and appropriate anatomy.

The evidence base is less extensive than that for the AUS, and device complications and explantation need to be discussed carefully.

4. Urethral bulking injections

Injectable bulking agents have historically been used to try to improve urethral closure.

They are minimally invasive, but their effectiveness in men following prostatectomy is limited.

Patients should understand that cure is uncommon and durability is poor compared with established surgical treatments.

They are therefore not generally considered the preferred treatment for significant post-prostatectomy stress incontinence.

What if you have urgency as well?

Not every leak after prostatectomy is caused by the sphincter.

Some men develop overactive bladder symptoms, including:

Urgency
Frequency
Nocturia
Urgency-associated leakage

This may require treatment directed at the bladder rather than the sphincter.

Treatment may include:

Bladder training
Fluid modification
Pelvic floor rehabilitation
Medication
Selected minimally invasive treatments for overactive bladder

If urgency is the dominant problem, it should be treated as an overactive bladder rather than assuming that an operation on the sphincter will solve everything.

What about men who have had radiotherapy?

Previous pelvic radiotherapy is particularly important when choosing surgery.

Radiation can affect the tissues and urethral blood supply and may increase the risk of complications and treatment failure.

For men with stress incontinence following radiotherapy, an artificial urinary sphincter is generally preferred over a male sling or adjustable balloon device.

This is one reason why your previous prostate cancer treatment is an important part of the surgical decision.

The decision is about more than pads

The goal of treatment is not simply:

“How many pads can we get you down to?”

It is about getting you back to the life you want to live.

That might mean being able to:

Exercise without worrying about leakage
Play golf or tennis
Go out without carrying spare pads
Travel confidently
Sleep without constantly worrying about leakage
Wear the clothes you want
Be intimate with your partner without anxiety

The appropriate treatment depends on both the objective severity of the incontinence and how much it affects your quality of life.

A practical assessment pathway

Step 1

Understand the symptoms

Stress leakage? Urgency? Mixed symptoms? Night-time leakage?

Step 2

Measure the problem

Validated questionnaire + bladder diary + pad weight.

Step 3

Check bladder emptying

Ultrasound and post-void residual.

Step 4

Assess pelvic floor function

Pelvic floor assessment and physiotherapy where appropriate.

Step 5

Look deeper when necessary

Urodynamics, and additional investigations such as cystoscopy when clinically indicated.

Step 6

Treat the cause

Bladder-directed treatment for urgency/detrusor dysfunction.

Sphincter-directed treatment for genuine stress incontinence.

Step 7

Consider surgery when appropriate

Mild–moderate SUI: male sling may be appropriate in selected men
Moderate–severe SUI: artificial urinary sphincter is often the preferred option
Severe SUI: AUS generally favoured over sling
Previous radiotherapy: AUS generally preferred
Failed sling: AUS is usually the most effective subsequent option

Don’t just put up with it

Urinary leakage after prostatectomy is common, but persistent incontinence should not simply be accepted as the price of prostate cancer treatment.

If leakage is interfering with your life, there is a structured pathway to determine exactly what is happening and what can be done about it.

A combination of symptom assessment, bladder diary, pad weight measurement, ultrasound, pelvic floor assessment and, where appropriate, urodynamics can provide a much clearer picture.

From there, treatment can be tailored to the individual, ranging from rehabilitation through to reconstructive continence surgery.

The aim is simple: better bladder control, greater confidence and getting you back to doing the things that matter to you.

When should you seek specialist assessment?

Consider seeing a urologist specialising in male continence if:

Significant leakage persists beyond the early recovery period
You are still using multiple pads several months after surgery
Leakage is affecting exercise, work, travel or intimacy
You have both urgency and stress leakage
You have difficulty emptying your bladder
You have previously had pelvic radiation
Your incontinence is getting worse rather than better
You are considering surgical treatment

Medical disclaimer

This information is intended for general educational purposes and does not replace an individual medical assessment. The appropriate investigation and treatment of urinary incontinence depends on your medical history, previous prostate treatment, bladder function, urethral anatomy and individual circumstances.

Microbiome of the Male Reproductive System: The Hidden Factor in Men’s Health

December 20, 2025/0 Comments/in Blog Post, Interstitial Cystitis/by agileadmin

When most people think about the microbiome, they imagine gut bacteria affecting digestion and immunity. But did you know that the male reproductive system also has its own unique microbiome? This hidden ecosystem of microorganisms plays a surprising role in fertility, hormone balance, and overall sexual health.

What Is the Male Reproductive Microbiome?

The male reproductive microbiome refers to the community of bacteria and other microorganisms living in the penis, testes, prostate, and semen. While it’s less studied than the gut microbiome, research shows that these microbes are crucial for maintaining reproductive health.

A balanced microbiome supports sperm quality, prevents infections, and even influences the immune environment of the reproductive tract. On the other hand, imbalances sometimes caused by antibiotics, poor hygiene, infections, or lifestyle factors can lead to fertility issues and other complications.

How the Microbiome Affects Fertility

Studies suggest that an unhealthy male reproductive microbiome may contribute to:

Reduced sperm motility: making it harder for sperm to reach the egg.
Decreased sperm count: fewer sperm can lower the chance of conception.
DNA fragmentation: damaged sperm DNA can affect embryo quality.
Inflammation: chronic inflammation in the reproductive tract can impair fertility and sexual health.

Even small changes in microbial balance can have a measurable impact on reproductive outcomes, highlighting why men’s microbiomes deserve attention.

Factors That Influence the Male Microbiome

Several lifestyle and environmental factors can disrupt the delicate balance of microbes:

Antibiotic use: kills both harmful and beneficial bacteria.
Diet: processed foods, sugar, and alcohol can negatively impact microbial health.
Hygiene: poor genital hygiene can allow harmful bacteria to thrive.
Sexual activity: sexually transmitted infections can alter microbial balance.
Chronic stress: stress hormones can influence bacterial populations and immunity.

Maintaining healthy habits is essential for keeping the microbiome in check.

Supporting a Healthy Male Microbiome

Here are practical ways men can support their reproductive microbial health:

Balanced diet: Include fiber-rich fruits, vegetables, fermented foods, and lean protein.
Probiotics: Supplements or natural sources (like yogurt or kefir) can help maintain beneficial bacteria.
Safe sexual practices: Use protection and get regular STI screenings.
Gentle hygiene: Avoid harsh soaps; washing with mild cleansers is best.
Lifestyle management: Reduce alcohol, quit smoking, manage stress, and exercise regularly.

Why It Matters

The male reproductive microbiome is more than just a scientific curiosity, it’s a critical component of sexual and reproductive health. By understanding and supporting this hidden ecosystem, men can improve fertility, reduce infection risk, and even support hormone balance and overall wellness.

Conclusion:
Men’s health isn’t just about testosterone, erections, or sperm count, it’s also about the microscopic world living inside the reproductive system. Paying attention to the male reproductive microbiome is a small step with potentially big benefits for fertility, sexual function, and overall health.

Living with an indwelling urethral catheter

November 23, 2025/0 Comments/in Bladder Surgery, Blog Post, Prostate Surgery, Urethral Surgery/by drjo

An indwelling urethral catheter is a soft tube passed through the urethra into the bladder. A small balloon holds it in place and urine drains into a bag. It may be needed for a few days after an operation or for longer when the bladder cannot empty safely. The reason for the catheter and a plan for review should be clear to the patient and the people helping with their care.[1, 2]

Why might a catheter be needed?

Common reasons include acute urinary retention, an obstruction to urine flow, temporary drainage after surgery, and selected cases of chronic retention when other options are unsuitable. In hospital, a catheter may be used to monitor urine output in a critically ill person or manage bleeding and clots. It can occasionally support comfort at the end of life. A urethral catheter is generally not the first response to urinary leakage alone.[1]

When practical, the team should discuss whether the catheter can be removed after a trial of void, whether intermittent self-catheterisation is possible, or whether a suprapubic catheter may be more suitable for longer-term drainage. The best choice depends on bladder function, dexterity, the underlying condition and the person’s wishes.[1, 3]

What might it feel like, and what can go wrong?

Some people notice discomfort or a sense of needing to pass urine after insertion. Bladder spasms can cause cramping or urine to leak around the tube. Leakage can also mean that the catheter is kinked or blocked, so it should be checked rather than simply treated as incontinence. Other possible problems include blood in the urine after insertion or a change, skin irritation, accidental pulling or displacement, blockage from debris or encrustation, and infection.[2, 3]

A long-term urethral catheter can also cause pressure or trauma at the urethral opening; persistent soreness or a change in its appearance deserves review. Bladder stones and repeated blockages are further reasons to reassess the drainage plan. The longer a catheter remains, the more opportunity there is for bacteria to colonise it, so it should stay in place only while needed.[3, 4]

How often should a long-term catheter be changed?

There is no single safe change interval for every catheter and every patient. The plan depends on the catheter material and manufacturer’s instructions, local nursing policy, comfort, drainage, and whether it repeatedly blocks or becomes encrusted. Some community protocols plan changes approximately every four to eight weeks, but an individual plan may differ. The interval should not exceed the relevant product’s recommended duration.[1, 3]

Changing a catheter more frequently just to prevent infection has not been shown to help. A catheter may instead need an earlier change if it is blocked, damaged, displaced, causing problems, or as part of managing a symptomatic infection. People with a history of difficult insertion, urethral injury or bleeding should have a specific plan for who can safely perform the change.[1, 3]

At each review, it is worth asking: Is the catheter still necessary? Could a trial without it or another drainage method be considered?[1]

Day-to-day care at home

Keep the drainage bag below bladder level, avoid kinks in the tubing, and secure the catheter so it does not pull. Wash your hands before and after handling the bag. Follow the nurse’s instructions for emptying it and for cleaning the area where the catheter enters the body. Ordinary hygiene is usually enough; do not disconnect the closed drainage system, flush the catheter or take preventive antibiotics unless your treating team has given a specific instruction.[3, 5]

Drink according to your usual health advice. If you have a fluid restriction for heart or kidney disease, follow that plan rather than trying to drink extra to “flush” the catheter. Ask your nurse which supplies to keep at home and whom to call after hours if drainage stops.[2]

Bacteria in urine: when are antibiotics needed?

With a catheter in place, bacteria commonly grow on the catheter surface. After a month, bacteriuria is found in nearly everyone with a long-term catheter. A positive urine culture without symptoms usually reflects colonisation, not an infection requiring antibiotics. Routine screening or treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria is generally discouraged because antibiotics can cause side effects and encourage resistant bacteria. Exceptions include pregnancy and certain invasive urological procedures, where the treating team will advise on testing and treatment.[4, 6]

Seek clinical assessment for possible infection if you develop fever, rigors, new pelvic or flank pain, feel distinctly unwell, or have other new symptoms that could indicate infection. In a frail person, a new change in function or confusion warrants assessment of several possible causes rather than automatically assuming a UTI. Cloudy or strong-smelling urine, sediment, or a positive dipstick on its own does not usually justify antibiotics.[4, 6, 7]

When a symptomatic catheter-associated UTI is suspected, a clinician should assess you and arrange a properly collected urine specimen if indicated—not from the drainage bag. Treatment is chosen in light of symptoms, culture results, allergies and local guidance. If the catheter has been in place for more than two weeks and still needs to remain, changing it as part of treatment is commonly recommended. Routine antibiotics at every scheduled catheter change are not recommended.[7, 8]

When to get help promptly

Contact your nurse or doctor promptly if urine stops draining, the catheter falls out, you have significant pain or new bleeding, or urine is leaking around the catheter with little in the bag. Check for a kink or a full bag, but do not forcefully flush or reinsert a catheter yourself unless specifically trained and instructed. Seek urgent medical care if drainage has stopped and you have a painful or swollen lower abdomen, or if you have fever, shaking chills or feel seriously unwell.[2]

Catheter support in Bundaberg

Some people can have catheter assessment and planned changes at home through a community nursing service. Ozcare and BlueCare provide home nursing in the Bundaberg area; whether a nurse can provide catheter care for an individual depends on referral, staffing, clinical needs, service area and funding arrangements. Ask the provider directly about availability and costs before relying on a visit.[9, 10]

For my Bundaberg patients, Sandra Ilett, a continence nurse with Community Nurse Service, is another local contact for bladder and catheter-related care. Sandra and her colleague Carla Kerr have also seen patients at the nurse-led clinic at The Friendlies Medical Suites. Patients can discuss a suitable referral and whether a home visit or clinic appointment is available. Community Nurse Service: (07) 4126 2002.[11] This mention recognises local nursing support; it is not a claim that one service is preferable for every patient.

A written catheter plan should record the reason for drainage, catheter details, the planned review or change, who will provide care, and whom to call if problems arise. Community nurses, the GP and urology team can then coordinate care across visits.

This article provides general information. Follow your individual catheter plan and seek clinical advice for new symptoms or a catheter that is not draining.

References

Mid-Urethral Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence: What Is the Current Australian Position?

October 30, 2025/0 Comments/in Blog Post, Urinary Incontinence, Vaginal Mesh/by drjo

Patient information for Australian women | Reviewed 22 September 2026

The word “mesh” can understandably cause concern. Public discussion has often grouped together several very different products and operations. A mid-urethral sling used to treat female stress urinary incontinence is not the same operation as transvaginal mesh used to repair pelvic organ prolapse, and it is also different from a single-incision mini-sling.

The Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand (USANZ) supports the continued availability of mid-urethral slings in Australia as one treatment option for appropriately selected women. That support is not unconditional: USANZ emphasises appropriate clinical governance, surgeon credentialing, informed consent, multidisciplinary review where appropriate, and monitoring of patient outcomes.

What is stress urinary incontinence?

Stress urinary incontinence, or SUI, is leakage caused by an increase in abdominal pressure, for example when coughing, sneezing, laughing, exercising or lifting. It is different from urge incontinence, in which leakage is associated with a sudden compelling need to pass urine.

An accurate diagnosis matters. Some women have both stress and urgency symptoms, difficulty emptying the bladder, prolapse, recurrent infections or previous pelvic surgery. A consultation may therefore include a history, examination, bladder diary, urine testing, measurement of residual urine and, in selected or complex cases, urodynamic studies or cystoscopy.

What is a mid-urethral sling?

A mid-urethral sling is a narrow strip of permanent synthetic polypropylene mesh placed beneath the middle part of the urethra. It provides support during coughing, exercise and other activities that raise abdominal pressure.

The two established approaches are:

Retropubic sling: the tape passes behind the pubic bone.
Transobturator sling: the tape passes through the obturator region towards the groin.

These approaches have different risk profiles. The retropubic route has a greater risk of bladder perforation and short-term voiding difficulty, while the transobturator route has a greater association with groin or thigh pain. The most appropriate approach depends on the woman’s anatomy, previous operations, clinical circumstances and preferences.

What does USANZ say?

USANZ states that mid-urethral slings have an established evidence base for relative safety and effectiveness and should remain available in Australia for the treatment of female SUI. In its 2023 statement, USANZ specifically linked continued use to the clinical-governance improvements introduced in Australia since 2018, including:

appropriate surgeon credentialing
careful patient selection
discussion through multidisciplinary processes where indicated
genuine informed consent
monitoring of outcomes through the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry.

This position supports patient choice, not routine surgery for every woman. Conservative care should usually be considered first, and non-mesh alternatives must be discussed when surgery is being considered.

What is the TGA position?

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates medical devices in Australia. Surgical mesh is classified as a Class III medical device, the highest-risk classification, requiring more stringent evidence and regulatory assessment.

Following its safety reviews, the TGA removed certain transvaginal prolapse mesh products and single-incision mini-slings from routine supply. This did not amount to a ban on established retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings for SUI. The TGA’s current register includes eligible Class III urogynaecological mesh devices intended for SUI; the precise indication must always be checked in the device’s approved Instructions for Use.

The TGA requires manufacturers to provide patient information leaflets and implant cards for these devices. A woman receiving a sling should know the product used and should retain her implant card.

How effective is a mid-urethral sling?

Mid-urethral sling surgery is one of the most extensively studied operations for female SUI. Australian safety and quality guidance describes it as highly effective in the short and medium term, with long-term studies showing sustained patient satisfaction for many women.

No operation can guarantee a cure. Outcomes depend on the definition of success, length of follow-up, type of sling, surgeon experience and the individual patient. Stress leakage may persist or recur, and urgency symptoms may remain, improve or occasionally develop after surgery.

What are the risks?

Most women do not develop a serious complication, but complications can be significant and may occur early or years later. Potential risks include:

bleeding, infection and anaesthetic complications
temporary or persistent difficulty emptying the bladder, sometimes requiring catheterisation or further surgery
bladder or urethral injury
urinary tract infection
new or worsened urinary urgency or urge incontinence
persistent or recurrent stress incontinence
vaginal mesh exposure
mesh erosion into the urethra or bladder
pelvic, vaginal, groin or thigh pain
pain during intercourse
rarely, injury to major blood vessels, bowel or other pelvic structures.

Mesh is intended to remain permanently. If a mesh complication develops, partial or complete removal may be considered, but complete removal can be technically difficult or impossible and may require more than one operation. Removal may not fully resolve pain and can cause stress incontinence to recur.

Seek medical assessment if you develop persistent pelvic or groin pain, pain during intercourse, vaginal bleeding or discharge, recurrent urinary infections, difficulty passing urine, blood in the urine, or recurrent leakage after sling surgery.

What are the alternatives?

Treatment should be individualised. Options include:

no active treatment or the use of continence products
lifestyle measures, including weight management, treatment of constipation and chronic cough, and smoking cessation
supervised pelvic-floor muscle training, usually for at least three months
a continence pessary in suitable women
urethral bulking injections, which are less invasive but generally less durable and may need repeating
an autologous fascial sling using the patient’s own tissue
Burch colposuspension using sutures and native tissue.

Autologous fascial sling and colposuspension avoid permanent synthetic mesh but usually involve a longer operation and recovery and have their own risks, including voiding difficulty. There is no single best operation for every woman.

Shared decision-making and informed consent

Before proceeding, a woman should have enough time and balanced information to consider:

whether her symptoms are predominantly stress, urgency or mixed incontinence
conservative, mesh and non-mesh options
the expected benefits and limitations of each option
short- and long-term risks, including mesh-specific complications
the surgeon’s training and experience with the proposed procedure and alternatives
what follow-up will occur and how complications would be managed
the name and TGA registration status of the proposed device.

A second opinion is reasonable, particularly if symptoms are complex, previous continence surgery has failed, chronic pelvic pain is present, or the available options remain unclear.

The balanced Australian position

Mid-urethral slings are not appropriate for every woman, but neither are they prohibited in Australia. USANZ supports their continued availability for carefully selected patients within strong clinical-governance systems. The TGA continues to regulate eligible SUI sling devices as Class III medical devices and requires enhanced patient information and traceability.

The most important principles are an accurate diagnosis, consideration of conservative care, a balanced discussion of mesh and non-mesh alternatives, surgeon credentialing, informed consent and structured follow-up.

Important: This article provides general educational information and does not replace individual medical advice. It does not claim endorsement or approval by AHPRA, USANZ or the TGA. These organisations do not pre-approve individual practitioner website articles. Treatment recommendations must be based on personal assessment and shared decision-making.

References and further reading

Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand. Vaginal mesh complications: USANZ submission, position statement and patient resources.
Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand. USANZ supports pause on mesh stress urinary incontinence surgery in New Zealand. 23 August 2023.
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Urogynaecological (transvaginal) surgical mesh hub. Updated 28 April 2025.
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian transvaginal surgical mesh regulatory actions.
Therapeutic Goods Administration. Current status of mesh products in Australia. Updated 9 June 2026.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Treatment options for stress urinary incontinence: information for consumers. 2018.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Care pathway for the management of stress urinary incontinence. 2018.
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Guidelines for advertising a regulated health service.
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. Summary of the advertising requirements.